Coopers 12-min run

coopertestCoopers 12-min run is the classical running test for estimating aerobic fitness. Run as far as you can on a flat surface for 12 minutes.

Instructions:
1. Warm up
2. Run as far as you can within 12 minutes. Should preferably be performed on a 400 m track.
3. Note how far you got and enter the distance, weight and gender in the calculator.

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

This calculator is also included in Fitness Test pro
Get it from App Store Get it from Google Play


Background:

The 12 min run test is also known as the Cooper test. It was developed in the sixties as an easy tool to estimate VO2max in soldiers.

The validity of this test is quite good if you are accustomed to running. For people not used to running it can be difficult to administer the speed from start to end and also peripheral discomfort in the legs can limit performance rather than circulatory capacity.

Reference:
Correlation between field and treadmill testing as a means of assessing maximal oxygen intake.
Cooper KH
JAMA. 1968 Jan 15;203(3):201-4.

Comments  

#23 Jame 2017-05-26 19:24
This piece ⲟf writing will assist the internet people fօr creating new website or even ɑ
blog from start to end.

Check оut my web-site - thong ke mb: http://profil20.no/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=804281
Quote
#22 Jerald 2017-05-26 16:40
TҺiѕ is a topic that is near to my heart... Take care!
Where are your contact details though?

My site ... du hoc han quoc vua hoc vua
lam: http://jaacisuiza.com/?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=476033
Quote
#21 Mari 2017-05-26 12:54
It's reallʏ ᴠery complex in thiѕ busy life to listen news
on TV, so I just use worⅼd wide web for thɑt purpose,
and get thе latest іnformation.

Feel free tо visit my site ... soi cau mƅ mien pɦi: http://soicaupro.com/
Quote
#20 Dorothy 2017-05-26 11:56
I thіnk that is аmong the most іmportant info foг me.

And i'm satisfied reading үour article. But wanna remark on sοme common thіngs,
Tɦe site taste іs wonderful, tһе articles is rеally excellent
: Ⅾ. Excellent activity, cheers

Also visit mү blog; soi cau ⅼo hom nay: http://rothbuildersverobeach.net/UserProfile/tabid/61/userId/3132258/Default.aspx
Quote
#19 Keith 2014-01-18 13:53
@Greg:

My advice would be to try to balance your training, putting more emphasis on stamina/ endurance and less on strength. And it`s a common misunderstandin g that endurance has a lot to do with pulmonary capacity, when it`s actually your cardiovascular performance that`s the limiting factor. Even though it`s a little bit difficult to find the distribution data concerning the evaluation of Cooper test results, I guess a score that qualifies for "excellent" would put you in the upper 10th percentile, but that`s just speculation on my behalf. It might just as well mean the upper 5th percentile (It would be nice if the staff of the site could comment on this). Anyway, cutting the "excellent" mark is far from the capacity of an elite athlete, who would probably manage a VO2 max of 65+ ml/kg/min. The world record is held by nordic cross country skiers, achieveing 90+ ml/kg/min.
Quote
#18 Andy 2013-11-17 22:51
52.7 VO2max based on the fastest 12 minutes of my 2.8 mile run this morning,Rated as Excellent :)

I.m a 44 year old male with wait to height ratio of 0.47, and a BMI of 22.7. I was very overweight and unfit for most of my 30s (BMI peaked at 31,2 ). I am so glad I have managed to turn things around in the last couple of years!
Quote
#17 brienne 2013-04-20 07:24
any cxhance you could do Cooper swim test calculator?
Quote
#16 Stephen Reynolds 2013-01-18 02:11
I haven't run in almost 3 weeks. I am a runner - but I unfortunately haven't stuck to a formal running workout. After a 5K run - I was able to calculate my 12 min VO2 based on my pace - and received 38.7 kg/ml/min - which for a 22 year old and 190 lbs - is apparently a fair performance

[Note: What is not taken into account is 1) wind speed = resistance (yes it's a factor even on a athletic track); 2) altitude; 3) temperature -- (now in my case these three factors were nominal to account for --- but were I say, to run in the mountains, this would not be a good calculator for such workouts)
Quote
#15 Ruben 2012-07-10 17:33
Think they should put in younger ages, as I'm a 16 year old athlete, theres barely any calculator where you can go under age 18, vo2 max seems to be right though, done a few tests offline, given me the same numbers. Sad it only gives me a very good at 60, where older athletes, 25year olds are stronger in real life, at a race and at their age I would get an excellent in this test. The vo2 max numbers are explained different by several tests, kinda weird.
Quote
#14 Oedipus 2012-05-29 01:15
The Bruce Test and the Cooper test seem to be pretty consistent. I am going in for treadmill test at my cardiologist, so I did a bit of research to see where I would fall. I replicated the test at my gym and found that I was in the very good category on the Bruce and Cooper tests. I am 50 yo and I can squeeze out about 12-13 minutes on the Bruce test. I can do a 8.0 MPH pace (7.5 minute mile) on the treadmill for 12 minutes - gives me the same score. Not sure why they exclude weight in the calculation. I am 6'6'and about 230 lbs. I changed my diet up earlier in the year and got down to about 215 lbs - and I was able to increase my mile pace to squeak out a 7.0 minute mile (8.5 MPH). I put some weight on to add a little more muscle. So seems like they should correct for weight.
Quote

Add comment

Comments can not be used for advertising

Security code
Refresh